It's been confirmed. In case you didn't know, Thief on the Xbox One runs at a native resolution of 1600 × 900p. The PlayStation 4 runs the game at 1920 × 1080p. An increase of over 633,000 pixels in favor of the PlayStation 4.
Eurogamer confirmed the resolution with Eidos Montreal's lead game director, Nicolas Cantin, where he defended the difference between the game running at 900p on the Xbox One and 1080p on the PS4, saying...
"You really need good eyes to see the difference," [the Xbox One version] "is as good as the PS4 version"."The immersion is more [on next-gen]," ... "We put more detail in, more special effects. But at the same time, we kept the same gameplay experience with the current-gen and the next-gen versions."
Right, so with that bit of damage control out of the way following Jeremy Conrad's spilling of the beans after accessing an early review copy of the game, the developers further talked about how resolutions really aren't as important as the community is making it out to be.
Lead level designer for Thief, Daniel Windfield Schmidt, spoke with OXM at a recent press event, where he told them...
"I think it's a pre-game topic,"... "As soon as you start playing the game, it's going to be much more about 'oh, how do you do this thing' or 'oh, you got that thing' - that's the kind of talk that I hope will become more the focus. But until you get your hands on it, it's whatever topic comes up."
Nick Canton, also working as the game's art director, also chimed in to add his two-cents and a pint of ale to the conversation, noting...
“And the consoles are new," ... "I think it's still a new topic, and like you said it's maybe a little bit bigger than it should be, but at some point we'll be able to talk just about Thief, once everybody's been hands-on."
But then the obvious question arose: why is the Xbox One sub-1080p? Why can't it do full HD resolutions? Why is it being left behind so early out of the gate? Why does it appear to be a fat, slow American system trailing behind a slim, healthy Japanese product? Check out Cantin's response...
"It's really more an engineering question, because on the creative side it never influences at all, we're not aware of that," ... "For us it was a 30 frames thing, and that's really important on that side, and for the engineers it was probably a constraint, that they had to work with to make some choices, but we're not involved with that kind of thing."
I feel sorry for those poor engineers, probably tasked with spinning gold out of snail feces. Not an easy task at all.
But they aren't the only ones dealing with the resolution restrictions of the Xbox One. Rebellion Games claims that their woes are coming to an end thanks to the new SDKs Microsoft sent out, and apparently Ubisoft is feeling the heat with Watch Dogs, as the game will also be sub-1080p on the Xbox One, along with Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes.
I know some people don't feel resolution and graphics are important, but the upgrade from last-gen to next-gen is all about upgrading. Paying a premium price to experience something new should bring something new, not graphics, gameplay and resolutions that the previous generation console provided.
We all know why the Xbox One is suffering from the performance crisis in the game department, though. The only question now is if Microsoft will go over and beyond to rectify the problem in some way?
Why Haven’t Kirsten Dunst And Other OGs Returned For New Jumanji Movies? It’s ‘Complicated.’
After The Back In Action Trailer Dropped, Fans Are So Stoked To See Cameron Diaz Returning To Acting
'Movies Will Be One Of The Last Things.' Ben Affleck Talks AI Concerns And Why He's Not Super Worried About It Taking Over
